A Sound and Complete Tableau Calculus for Reasoning about only Knowing and Knowing at Most

نویسنده

  • Riccardo Rosati
چکیده

We define a tableau calculus for the logic of only knowing and knowing at most ONL, which is an extension of Levesque’s logic of only knowing OL. The method is based on the possible-world semantics of the logic ONL, and can be considered as an extension of known tableau calculi for modal logic K45. From the technical viewpoint, the main features of such an extension are the explicit representation of “unreachable” worlds in the tableau, and an additional branch closure condition implementing the property that each world must be either reachable or unreachable. The calculus allows for establishing the computational complexity of reasoning about only knowing and knowing at most. Moreover, we prove that the method matches the worst-case complexity lower bound of the satisfiability problem for both ONL and OL. With respect to [22], in which the tableau calculus was originally presented, in this paper we both provide a formal proof of soundness and completeness of the calculus, and prove the complexity results for the logic ONL.

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

AOL: A logic of Acting, Sensing, Knowing, and Only Knowing

This work is motivated by the existence of two useful but quite different knowledge representation formalisms, the situation calculus due to McCarthy, and the logic OL of only knowing due to Levesque. In this paper, we propose the logic AOL, which combines both approaches in a clean and natural way. We present a semantics for AOL which generalizes the semantics of OL to account for actions, and...

متن کامل

A Logic of Acting, Sensing, Knowing, and Only Knowing

This work is motivated by the existence of two useful but quite different knowledge representation formalisms, the situation calculus due to McCarthy, and the logic of only knowing due to Levesque. In this paper, we propose the logic , which combines both approaches in a clean and natural way. We present a semantics for which generalizes the semantics of to account for actions, and a sound and ...

متن کامل

A Logic of Knowing How

In this paper, we propose a single-agent modal logic framework for reasoning about goal-direct “knowing how” based on ideas from linguistics, philosophy, modal logic and automated planning. We first define a modal language to express “I know how to guarantee φ given ψ” with a semantics not based on standard epistemic models but labelled transition systems that represent the agent’s knowledge of...

متن کامل

Analytic Cut-Free Tableaux for Regular Modal Logics of Agent Beliefs

We present a sound and complete tableau calculus for a class BReg of extended regular grammar logics which contains useful epistemic logics for reasoning about agent beliefs. Our calculus is cut-free and has the analytic superformula property so it gives a decision procedure. Applying sound global caching to the calculus, we obtain the first optimal (EXPTime) tableau decision procedure for BReg...

متن کامل

A Theorem Prover for Equality using Lemmas

Equality handling has been traditionally one of the weaknesses of tableau-based theorem provers in general, from which those based on the Connection Tableau Calculus are not an exception. The Intermediate Lemma Extension is based on a simple extension to Logic Programming in which positive subgoals are skipped and all clauses treated as Horn clauses, allowing to derive clauses consisting of onl...

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

عنوان ژورنال:
  • Studia Logica

دوره 69  شماره 

صفحات  -

تاریخ انتشار 2001